The Delhi High Court has intervened in a nationwide tax dispute involving bonuses and performance-linked pay received by partners in professional firms. In a significant move, the court has stayed the recovery of tax demands and directed the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) to issue a formal clarification on the matter.
The Core Dispute: Double Taxation?
Tax authorities in major cities—including Delhi, Mumbai, and Chennai—have recently issued orders demanding tax on bonuses paid to partners of large audit, consultancy, and legal firms (including members of the Big 4).
-
The Firms’ Argument: Professional firms argue that these bonuses are a distribution of profits. Since the firm has already paid corporate tax on its total profits, taxing the same amount again in the hands of the partner constitutes double taxation.
-
The Department’s View: Tax officials have categorized these payouts as “remuneration” or “salary-like” income under Section 28(v) of the Income Tax Act, attempting to tax them separately from the exempt profit-share.
Key Highlights of the Court Order
-
Interim Relief: The court has stayed all recovery proceedings for the petitioners, providing immediate financial breathing room for the affected partners and firms.
-
CBDT Mandate: The Chairman of the CBDT has been directed to examine the issue. The court noted that because this involves a “question of law” affecting thousands of professionals across India, a uniform policy is required.
-
Specific Provisions: The legal battle centers on the interplay between Section 28(v) (taxability of partner remuneration) and Section 40(b) (limits on deductions for firms).
Context: New TDS Rules in 2026
This legal friction coincides with the introduction of Section 194T (effective April 1, 2025/2026), which mandates a 10% TDS on payments like salary, bonus, and interest made by a firm to its partners if the aggregate exceeds ₹20,000.
Why it matters: If the CBDT rules that bonuses are taxable remuneration rather than profit-sharing, it could lead to higher tax liabilities for senior professionals and require a complete restructuring of how partnership firms distribute their annual earnings.
